When oil wells lose pressure, artificial lift systems are critical for maintaining production. This article breaks down the top five systems, explaining how they work, their ideal conditions, and key factors to consider when choosing one. Here’s a quick overview:
- Sucker Rod Pumps: Best for shallow to moderate depths and heavy oil. Challenges include wear from sand and inefficiency with high gas content.
- Electric Submersible Pumps (ESPs): Handle deep wells and high volumes but are sensitive to gas and solids, with higher energy costs.
- Gas Lift Systems: Versatile for various depths and great for wells with high gas content. They have lower maintenance needs but require gas injection infrastructure.
- Progressive Cavity Pumps (PCPs): Ideal for sandy or viscous fluids in shallow to moderate wells but struggle with high gas-to-oil ratios.
- Hydraulic Jet Pumps: Effective in deep, high-pressure wells and simpler to maintain, but require consistent high-pressure fluid supply.
Each system has unique strengths and limitations based on well depth, fluid properties, and production goals.
Artificial Lift – Introduction
Quick Comparison
| System | Well Depth | Production Rate | Sand Tolerance | Gas Tolerance | Initial Cost | Maintenance Needs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sucker Rod Pump | Shallow to moderate | Low to moderate | Low | Moderate | Low | Frequent |
| Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) | Deep | High | Moderate | Low | High | Less frequent |
| Gas Lift System | Shallow to deep | Moderate | High | High | Moderate | Low |
| Progressive Cavity Pump (PCP) | Shallow to moderate | Low to moderate | High | Low | Moderate | Periodic |
| Hydraulic Jet Pump | Deep | Low to moderate | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate to High | Balanced |
Choosing the right system depends on your well’s specific conditions and production needs. Dive into the details below to learn more about each option.
How to Choose the Right Artificial Lift System
Selecting the right artificial lift system is critical. A poor decision can lead to reduced production and increased maintenance costs, so it’s essential to weigh both technical and economic factors carefully.
Start by considering the depth of the well and its lifting capacity. For shallow wells, sucker rod pumps are often a good fit. Deeper wells, however, may require electric submersible pumps (ESPs) or gas lift systems. The total dynamic head – essentially the vertical distance combined with friction losses – plays a big role in determining the energy requirements for these systems.
Fluid characteristics are another major factor. Heavy crude oil with high viscosity, water cuts, or sand can strain pump performance. Similarly, if the well has a high gas-to-oil ratio, gas lift systems might perform better than mechanical pumps.
Your production targets and flow rates need to align with the system’s capacity. Equipment should be sized to handle both current production levels and any future changes. Oversized systems can waste energy, while undersized ones may restrict production. Site-specific constraints also come into play here.
Surface constraints can influence your choice. For example, if electrical power is limited, ESPs may not be an option. Similarly, if there’s no high-pressure gas source, gas lift systems won’t work. Space restrictions around the wellhead or logistical challenges, like difficult road access, might make compact and portable systems more practical.
Lifecycle costs are just as important as the initial price tag. Consider long-term operating expenses, maintenance needs, energy consumption, and the availability of spare parts. This is especially important in remote areas where service visits are less frequent.
Environmental and regulatory requirements also play a role. Local rules, such as noise ordinances, emissions limits, or vapor recovery mandates, might make certain systems more suitable than others.
Don’t overlook operational expertise. Teams with experience in maintaining specific systems can reduce downtime and ensure efficient operation. If training is needed, factor that into your decision.
For wells with shorter lifespans, simpler and more cost-effective systems are usually the way to go. On the other hand, long-term wells often justify investing in more advanced solutions.
Finally, formation characteristics like reservoir pressure, permeability, and completion design can impact system performance. For example, naturally fractured reservoirs or wells with sand control measures might need lift methods that can handle variable inflow or periodic cleanouts.
NOVA Petroleum Services and Atokan Drilling Technologies Inc provide support to help operators match these considerations with their operational needs and budgets.
1. Sucker Rod Pump (Beam Pump)
Sucker rod pumps, often referred to as beam pumps or "nodding donkeys", are a common method for lifting oil. They work by using a surface unit to drive a series of sucker rods connected to a downhole pump. This setup powers a plunger pump that alternates valve positions to draw in and push out fluids. Factors like well depth and the type of fluid being produced play a big role in determining how well these pumps perform.
Well Depth Range
These pumps are typically most effective in wells with shallow to moderate depths. As the depth increases, the weight of the rod string and the mechanical stress become limiting factors. For deeper wells, operators often need to carefully adjust the rod string design to maintain performance.
Fluid Properties
Sucker rod pumps are particularly effective for lifting heavy, viscous crude oil, making them a go-to option in areas where these conditions are common. However, they can face challenges when dealing with high gas-to-oil ratios. Too much gas can result in gas locking – a situation where gas compresses during the upstroke instead of being displaced – leading to a drop in efficiency. Additionally, wells that produce a lot of sand or debris can cause significant wear and tear on the downhole components, as the abrasive materials accelerate damage over time.
2. Electric Submersible Pump (ESP)
Electric submersible pumps (ESPs) offer a reliable way to handle high-volume production, combining an electric motor with a centrifugal pump placed deep underground. Because they operate entirely below the surface, they are ideal for wells that require significant lifting power and uninterrupted operation. Let’s break down the key factors that make ESPs suitable for various well conditions.
Well Depth Range
ESPs are built for deep wells, typically performing best in depths ranging from 1,500 to over 10,000 feet. Their sturdy design allows them to handle the heavy lifting required at such depths, and they can be positioned far below the wellhead. This makes them particularly effective for deepwater subsea fields. Their ability to operate at these depths pairs well with their impressive flow capabilities.
Production Rate
These pumps are designed to handle large volumes of fluid, with the capacity to lift anywhere from hundreds to over 20,000 barrels per day. This high output makes them an excellent choice for maximizing production rates.
Fluid Properties
ESPs perform best with low-viscosity oil and are well-suited for water-producing wells. Modern ESPs are engineered to handle challenging conditions, such as high gas-to-oil ratios (GORs), corrosive fluids, abrasives, and extreme temperatures. However, they are sensitive to gas and solids, which can reduce efficiency and increase wear. To address high gas content, operators may need to use downhole gas separators or implement pump-off control systems to maintain optimal performance.
Lifecycle Costs
While ESPs are effective, they require substantial electrical power, which can lead to higher operating costs. These ongoing expenses should be carefully considered when selecting a pumping system.
sbb-itb-325a090
3. Gas Lift System
Gas lift systems are a go-to solution for boosting oil production by injecting high-pressure gas into the well. This process reduces the fluid’s density, making it easier to flow to the surface. Designed to tackle specific well challenges, gas lift systems also offer flexibility, making them a reliable choice for wells with varying conditions.
Let’s break down the key performance factors that make these systems so effective.
Well Depth Range
Gas lift systems are incredibly versatile when it comes to well depth. They work efficiently in wells ranging from shallow depths of about 1,000 feet to ultra-deep setups exceeding 15,000 feet. As the gas expands during its ascent, it enhances the lifting process. For deeper wells, continuous gas lift is the go-to method, ensuring a steady gas injection to maintain optimal flow. On the other hand, intermittent gas lift is better suited for shallower wells with lower bottom-hole pressure, where periodic gas injections can effectively lift the fluid. This adaptability makes gas lift systems a favorite for offshore deepwater operations, where other methods often face challenges with installation and upkeep.
Production Rate
Gas lift systems can handle a wide range of production rates, making them suitable for wells with varying outputs. They can manage anywhere from 50 to 15,000 barrels per day, depending on the well’s conditions and the amount of gas injected. For wells with lower production rates, intermittent gas lift is ideal, as it works by periodically lifting slugs of liquid. In contrast, continuous gas lift is better for wells with higher output, providing a consistent flow. The ability to adjust gas injection volumes in real-time gives operators precise control over production rates.
Fluid Properties
One of the standout features of gas lift systems is their ability to handle challenging fluids that can cause issues for other artificial lift methods. For instance, they work well with high-viscosity crude oil because the injected gas lowers the overall fluid density, making it easier to lift. Wells with high gas-to-oil ratios also benefit, as the additional gas aids in the lifting process. Additionally, these systems are well-suited for handling solids and sand production since they lack downhole rotating parts that could wear out or clog. Even corrosive fluids are less of a concern, as the gas lift valves are the only downhole components exposed to the well fluids, and these can be made from materials resistant to corrosion.
Lifecycle Costs
Gas lift systems are known for their cost efficiency over their operational life. The initial capital investment is relatively low compared to other artificial lift methods because the downhole equipment is minimal, typically consisting of gas lift valves and, in some cases, a packer. Installation is straightforward, as the system doesn’t require complex motors or extensive electrical setups. Operating costs primarily revolve around gas compression and injection, and the absence of moving parts downhole means fewer maintenance interventions. This translates to lower workover costs and reduced production downtime. For operators, gas lift systems often deliver a solid return on investment, especially in fields where gas is readily available or where alternative lift methods would be less practical.
4. Progressive Cavity Pump (PCP)
Progressive cavity pumps are designed to tackle some of the most challenging fluids in oil production. These pumps use a helical rotor that rotates within a double-helix stator, creating sealed cavities that efficiently move fluid from the well bottom to the surface. This setup makes PCPs a great choice for wells producing heavy oil, fluids with high sand content, or other harsh conditions that would quickly wear out traditional pumps.
One of the standout features of PCPs is their gentle pumping action. This minimizes fluid shear, which is critical when handling sensitive crude oil that could lose value if its properties are altered during extraction. Additionally, PCPs can handle significant amounts of solids without immediate failure, making them a reliable option for wells prone to sand production. With this foundation, let’s explore how PCPs perform across various operating conditions, including depth, fluid properties, production rates, and costs.
Well Depth Range
PCPs are most effective in wells between 500 and 6,000 feet deep, with their sweet spot lying between 1,500 and 4,000 feet. In deeper wells, friction and the weight of the rod string can reduce efficiency and increase wear. Shallower wells, particularly those under 2,000 feet, benefit from optimal torque delivery and reduced mechanical stress, allowing the pump to operate more smoothly.
Fluid Properties
These pumps excel at handling sand and solids concentrations of up to 15% by volume, though they perform best with concentrations below 5%. The elastomeric material of the stator accommodates small particles, preventing the jamming issues that plague other pump systems.
However, PCPs struggle with high gas-to-oil ratios. If free gas exceeds 10-15% by volume at the pump intake, efficiency drops sharply. This is because the pump relies on liquid to maintain a proper seal between the rotor and stator. Excessive gas can lead to cavitation and reduced lifting capacity. For wells with gas-to-oil ratios above 500 cubic feet per barrel, additional gas separation equipment or alternative lift methods are often necessary.
Temperature tolerance is another key factor. Standard elastomeric stators work well up to 250°F, while specialized materials can push that limit to 350°F. Beyond these temperatures, stator degradation accelerates, leading to more frequent replacements and higher costs.
Production Rate
PCPs can handle production rates ranging from 5 to 1,500 barrels per day, with their optimal range being 50 to 500 barrels per day. Larger displacement pumps can manage higher volumes but require more torque and horsepower. Operating speeds typically fall between 100 and 500 RPM, with lower speeds extending equipment life but reducing production rates.
For low-rate wells producing under 50 barrels per day, PCPs offer excellent efficiency and control, making them an economical choice for marginal wells. On the other hand, high-rate applications exceeding 1,000 barrels per day demand larger pumps, more powerful drive systems, and more frequent maintenance.
Lifecycle Costs
The initial investment for a PCP system typically ranges from $15,000 to $45,000. This includes the downhole pump assembly, rod string, surface drive unit, and installation. Operating costs are primarily tied to electricity consumption, which varies between 5 and 25 horsepower depending on production needs. Maintenance intervals range from 2-3 years under ideal conditions to annual upkeep in harsher environments. Replacing a stator generally costs between $3,000 and $8,000, including workover expenses.
PCPs deliver the best return on investment in wells producing heavy oil or fluids with high solids content. Their ability to handle tough conditions with minimal downtime ensures consistent production, making them a worthwhile investment for challenging environments.
5. Hydraulic Jet Pump
Hydraulic jet pumps serve as a solid option for deep, high-pressure wells, offering an alternative to traditional artificial lift systems. These pumps work by using high-pressure fluid from a surface unit, which interacts with a downhole nozzle and diffuser to lift production fluids. Unlike mechanical systems, they eliminate the need for complex downhole components, relying instead on a simpler, more efficient design.
This streamlined setup makes hydraulic jet pumps particularly effective for specific deep well conditions.
Well Depth Range
Hydraulic jet pumps shine in deep well applications where high bottomhole pressures improve their performance. They are especially useful in scenarios where mechanical systems might struggle to operate effectively.
Fluid Properties
One of the standout features of hydraulic jet pumps is their ability to handle less-than-ideal working fluids. They are more forgiving with hydraulic fluids that contain moderate levels of solids or scaling, making them a practical choice for wells with such challenges.
Lifecycle Costs
When it comes to cost, hydraulic jet pumps have an edge. Their initial cost is typically lower than more intricate systems like piston pumps, which require complex mechanical components and challenging installations. Additionally, the simpler design with fewer moving parts makes maintenance more straightforward. However, it’s important to monitor the wear on the nozzle and diffuser and ensure a consistent supply of high-pressure fluid for optimal operation.
System Comparison Chart
Choosing the right lift system becomes much easier with a side-by-side comparison of key parameters. The chart below breaks down essential criteria, helping operators align system capabilities with the specific demands of their well conditions. Factors like performance, costs, and maintenance needs can differ greatly depending on the field environment.
| System | Well Depth | Production Rate | Sand Tolerance | Gas Tolerance | Initial Cost | Maintenance Frequency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sucker Rod Pump | Suitable for moderate depths | Best for lower production rates | Low | Moderate | Lower upfront cost | Requires frequent maintenance |
| Electric Submersible Pump (ESP) | Ideal for deeper wells | Handles high production levels | Moderate | Lower | Higher initial investment | Less frequent maintenance |
| Gas Lift System | Effective in deep wells | Moderate production capability | High | Excellent | Moderately priced | Maintenance needed less often |
| Progressive Cavity Pump (PCP) | Great for shallow to moderate depths | Flexible for various production needs | Excellent | Lower | Mid-range cost | Requires periodic upkeep |
| Hydraulic Jet Pump | Designed for deeper wells | Provides controlled production | Moderate | Moderate | Mid to high cost | Balanced maintenance schedule |
This chart provides a snapshot of how different lift systems perform under varying conditions. Keep in mind that factors like operating expenses, power requirements, and installation complexity can also influence your decision. Matching these elements to your unique operational needs is key to optimizing performance.
Conclusion
Selecting the right artificial lift system is a crucial decision that directly impacts well performance and operational efficiency. Each system is tailored for specific well conditions and production requirements. For instance, sucker rod pumps are ideal for shallow to moderate depths with consistent production needs, while electric submersible pumps excel in high-volume, deep well operations. Gas lift systems shine in challenging environments with high gas content, and progressive cavity pumps are well-suited for handling sandy or viscous fluids. Meanwhile, hydraulic jet pumps provide precise control for complex downhole conditions.
A quick glance at the key differences – such as depth capacity, production rates, sand tolerance, and maintenance requirements – can guide your choice. Making the wrong decision can lead to reduced production, higher costs, and frequent downtime. On the other hand, choosing the right system ensures maximum recovery rates and lowers long-term expenses.
Beyond the technical comparisons, having access to expert guidance is invaluable. Professionals who understand both the specifications and practical performance of these systems can make a significant difference. NOVA Petroleum Services / Atokan Drilling Technologies Inc stands out in this regard, offering high-quality artificial lift systems from top manufacturers across the USA, Canada, the UK, and the European Union. With years of experience, they specialize in matching the right systems to your operational needs while providing comprehensive support – from equipment supply to upgrades.
FAQs
How can I choose the right artificial lift system for my oil well?
Choosing the best artificial lift system for your oil well hinges on a mix of critical factors like well depth, reservoir pressure, production rate, and the characteristics of the extracted fluid. Beyond these technical aspects, it’s essential to weigh the operational costs and the long-term financial impact of each option.
Take into account the unique challenges your well might present. Does it involve high gas content, heavy oil, or inconsistent production rates? These specifics can significantly influence your choice. Collaborating with industry professionals and utilizing comprehensive well data can guide you toward a system that boosts efficiency and aligns with your production objectives.
What are the long-term costs associated with different artificial lift systems?
The long-term costs of artificial lift systems depend on various factors like operational expenses, system complexity, and maintenance demands. For instance, certain systems might come with a higher initial price tag but need less upkeep, while others could require more frequent maintenance, driving up costs over time.
To get a clearer picture of these costs, it’s crucial to factor in the unique characteristics of your oil well – things like production rates, depth, and environmental conditions. Selecting a system that aligns with your well’s specific needs can help maintain efficient production while keeping expenses manageable.
How do environmental and regulatory standards affect the choice of an artificial lift system?
Environmental and regulatory standards are essential when selecting the right artificial lift system for an oil well. Key factors like energy efficiency, emissions control, and noise reduction must be considered to meet environmental guidelines and reduce the system’s impact on its surroundings.
The well’s location and infrastructure also play a big role. For instance, being near power sources or having access to the electrical grid can determine which systems are practical. Following these standards isn’t just about meeting regulations – it also helps ensure production remains efficient and environmentally conscious.